Clinical decision‐making processes among graduate nurses, specialist nurses and nurse practitioners A collaborative international study

Author:

Levy‐Malmberg Rika12ORCID,Boman Erika13,Lehwaldt Daniela4,Fagerström Lisbeth15,Lockwood Emily B6

Affiliation:

1. University of South‐Eastern Norway Kongsberg Norway

2. Novia University of Applied Sciences Vaasa Finland

3. Åland University of Applied Sciences Mariehamn Finland

4. Dublin City University School of Nursing Psychotherapy & Community Health Dublin Ireland

5. Åbo Akademi University Vaasa Finland

6. University College Cork School of Nursing and Midwifery Cork Ireland

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore clinical decision‐making by comparing the processes used by three groups of nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals: in Norway, Finland and Ireland.BackgroundClinical decision‐making in an emergency department environment is a complex process often occurring in times of crisis. It is an important aspect contributing to the quality of care. However, empirical research is limited regarding the decision‐making process in different nursing roles.MethodsIn accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research, a qualitative and observational study was conducted to explore clinical decision‐making by comparing the processes used by three groups of nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals: in Norway, Finland and Ireland. Six Registered Nurses, six Nurse Specialists and six Nurse Practitioners were observed. A total of 40 hours of observation was made at each setting according to a structured observation guideline, followed by clarifying questions. The data material was analysed by means of a qualitative manifest and latent content analysis.ResultsThree themes arose: acting in accordance with routines, previous experience and intuition; considering patient experience; and facilitating new alternatives based on critical thinking. The Registered Nurses mainly used the first approach, the Nurse Specialists used the first and the second approaches, and the Nurse Practitioners used all three approaches.ConclusionsThe results highlight the differences in decision‐making processes between these groups. Nurse Practitioners were the only group that facilitated and evaluated new alternatives using their clinical autonomy, such as stepping up and making independent and collaborative decision‐making.ImplicationThe results can be used in countries developing advanced practice nursing education and defining their scope of practice to inform stakeholders.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3