Livestock grazing is an effective conservation tool for Californian coastal grassland ecology: An eight‐year study on vegetation dynamics

Author:

Evans Andrew W.1ORCID,Woodward Brian D.2ORCID,Wyckoff A. Christy3ORCID,Toledo David4ORCID,Duke Sara5ORCID,Fischer Christy6,Núñez Claudio7,Sierra‐Corona Rodrigo8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Waiʻanae Mountains Watershed Partnership, Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit University of Mānoa Honolulu Hawaiʻi USA

2. Woodward Ecological Pacific Grove California USA

3. Redwing Ranch LLC Waterloo Illinois USA

4. USDA‐ARS Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory Mandan North Dakota USA

5. USDA‐ARS Plains Area Administrative Office College Station Texas USA

6. Trust for Public Land San Francisco California USA

7. Santa Lucia Conservancy Carmel California USA

8. Borderlands Restoration Network Patagonia Arizona USA

Abstract

AbstractQuestionsLivestock grazing is an expanding land management tool for habitat and fuel management in California grassland ecosystems, despite mixed conclusions about its effects. Our study investigated the following questions: Does a targeted grazing regime promote grassland functioning by clearing bare ground and reducing dead litter cover? Does targeted grazing reduce grassland fuels? Does targeted grazing promote native species cover and diversity? Does targeted grazing reduce non‐native, invasive species cover and diversity? LocationThe Santa Lucia Preserve, Carmel, California, USA.MethodsMonitoring grazed and ungrazed treatment plots within 17 study sites, we surveyed the effects of a targeted grazing regime on bare ground cover, litter cover and depth, herb height, and diversity and cover of different native and non‐native species groups over an eight‐year period.ResultsOn average, grazing successfully increased bare ground (by 2.8% cover), decreased litter depth (by 3.5 cm) and cover (by 12%), and decreased herb height (by 3.9 cm). Grazed plots had greater cover of native annual forbs (+1.2% cover), while decreasing invasive Bromus diandrus (by 6.0% cover). There was no difference in either native or non‐native species diversity.ConclusionsTargeted grazing can be an appropriate tool to accomplish conservation goals, including biomass management and canopy clearing, while improving native annual forbs without risk to native species as a whole. Further steps in adaptive management must examine how the application of grazing may be altered to further promote native species and to inhibit invasive species.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology

Reference51 articles.

1. Restoring California's inland grasslands: Don't forget the forbs!;Aigner P.;Fremontia,2011

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Grass-livestock interaction: a critical review of current research progress;Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems;2024-06-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3