Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention

Published:2016-11-17 Issue:2 Volume:45 Page:193-204
ISSN:0269-2813
Container-title:Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
language:en
Short-container-title:Aliment Pharmacol Ther

Author:

Emilsson L.¹²³,Holme Ø.¹⁴,Bretthauer M.¹⁵³,Cook N. R.³⁶,Buring J. E.³⁶,Løberg M.¹⁵,Adami H.-O.³⁷,Sesso H. D.³⁶,Gaziano M. J.⁶,Kalager M.¹³⁸

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health and Society; University of Oslo; Oslo Norway

2. Primary Care Research Unit; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter; Värmland Sweden

3. Department of Transplantation Medicine; K. G. Jebsen Center for Colorectal Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo Norway

4. Department of Epidemiology; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Boston MA USA

5. Department of Medicine; Sørlandet Hospital; Kristiansand Norway

6. Division of Preventive Medicine; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School; Boston MA USA

7. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden

8. Telemark Hospital; Skien Norway

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Stiftelsen Blanceflor Boncompagni Ludovisi, född Bildt

Kreftforeningen

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Gastroenterology,Hepatology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/apt.13857/fullpdf

Reference46 articles.

1. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals;Holme;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013

2. Aspirin for prophylactic use in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review and overview of reviews;Sutcliffe;Health Technol Assess,2013

3. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis;Hassan;Gut,2011

4. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions www.cochrane-handbook.org 2011

5. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement;Moher;PLoS Med,2009

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The role of gut microbiota and drug interactions in the development of colorectal cancer;Frontiers in Pharmacology;2023-08-23

2. Aspirin chemoprevention in colorectal cancer: network meta-analysis of low, moderate, and high doses;British Journal of Surgery;2023-07-27

3. Target trial emulation of aspirin after diagnosis of colorectal polyps;European Journal of Epidemiology;2023-06-15

4. Letter: long‐term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal associated with heritable factors, colonoscopic surveillance and aspirin—authors' reply;Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics;2022-04-26

5. Pre-Diagnosis Aspirin Use Has No Effect on Overall Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Study of a Multi-Racial Population;Cureus;2022-03-02