Jurors'Evaluations of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Jurors'Evaluations of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message

Published:2003-04 Issue:2 Volume:28 Page:441-482
ISSN:0897-6546
Container-title:Law Social Inquiry
language:en
Short-container-title:Law & Social Inquiry

Author:

Ivković Sanja Kutnjak,Hans Valerie P.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,General Social Sciences

Reference51 articles.

1. Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social^cognitive analysis.

2. Brief Amici Curiae of Neil Vidmar et al. in Support of Respondents. 1998 . Kumho Tire v. Carmichael, 1998 U. S. Briefs 1709.

3. Jonathan D. Casper, and Seidman Diamond Shari . 1993 . Estimating Damages and Predicting Violence: The Influence of Experts in the Courtroom. Paper presented at the meeting of the Law and Society Association, Chicago, May1993 .

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making;Medicine, Science and the Law;2022-02-17

2. Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence;Frontiers in Psychology;2021-12-23

3. Using mixture models to examine group difference among jurors: an illustration involving the perceived strength of forensic science evidence;Law, Probability and Risk;2020-12-01

4. How Do Legal Experts Cope With Medical Reports and Forensic Evidence? The Experiences, Perceptions, and Narratives of Swiss Judges and Other Legal Experts;Frontiers in Psychiatry;2019-02-13

5. Jurors’ perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility;Forensic Science International;2018-10