The Indoors/Outdoors Divide: Homelessness, Rat Infestation, and Spatial Management in Downtown Los Angeles

Abstract

In 2019, Los Angeles, California's City Hall was reported to be infested with rats. LA's pest control contractor later drew a link between this rat problem and nearby encampments of unhoused residents. I use these connected cases of homelessness and rat control in Los Angeles to investigate the spatial and symbolic logics that guide urban social processes. Using computational and qualitative text analysis, interviews, and participant observation, I argue that rats and homelessness are issues tied to the proper place of nature in cities. While urban nature is central to the aspirational goals of urbanization, where institutions craft a desirable, recognizably urban life, I argue that managing it means not just introducing “good” nature (parks, street trees, etc.) to cities, but also keeping “bad” nature at bay. Practically, this entails guarding public faith in the boundary between “indoors” and “outdoors.” Homelessness and rat infestations present challenges to this goal because they represent inverse spatial transgressions of the indoors/outdoors divide. Rats bring the outdoors inside, compromising safety and security. Homeless encampments, meanwhile, represent domestic, indoor life spilling over into the outdoors. City institutions materially maintain the indoors/outdoors divide and symbolically attend to it by removing meaningful indications of these spatial transgressions.