Influence of abutment macro‐ and micro‐geometry on morphologic and morphometric features of peri‐implant connective tissue

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of the present human observational study is to provide morphologic and morphometric analysis of peri‐implant connective tissue next to abutments with divergent or convergent macro‐geometry and different surface micro‐characteristics.Materials and MethodsThirty patients were rehabilitated with single implants in the posterior area and one out of three different healing abutments with a one‐stage technique: machined divergent abutment (DIV‐MAC), machined convergent abutment (CONV‐MAC) or convergent abutment with ultrathin threaded surface (CONV‐UTM). At 3 months postimplant insertion, peri‐implant soft tissue was harvested; the following outcomes were investigated: histomorphometry (vertical width of connective and epithelial components) as detected by histology and polarized light; and connective tissue vertical width and 3D organization as detected by synchrotron‐based high‐resolution phase‐contrast‐based tomography (PhC‐μCT).ResultsSignificant differences in connective tissue vertical dimension (aJE‐AM) were found between DIV‐MAC and both CONV‐MAC and CONV‐UTM, both by histology and PhC‐μCT, with significantly higher values for the last two groups. Moreover, 2D histological analysis did not find significant differences in the junctional epithelium vertical dimension (PM‐aJE). Importantly, PhC‐μCT analysis revealed, at 3D level, significant greater amount and density of collagen bundles for CONV‐UTM compared with the other two groups.ConclusionsConvergent abutment profiles, regardless of their surface micro‐geometry, seem to favor axial development of peri‐implant connective tissue. Moreover, ultrathin threaded surfaces seem associated with denser and greater connective tissue organization, which might improve peri‐implant soft tissue seal.