Role of optically pumped magnetometers in presurgical epilepsy evaluation: Commentary of the American Clinical Magnetoencephalography Society

Author:

Bagić Anto I.1ORCID,Bowyer Susan M.2,Burgess Richard C.3,Funke Michael E.4,Lowden Andrea5,Mohamed Ismail S.6,Wilson Tony7,Zhang Wenbo8,Zillgitt Andrew J.9,Tenney Jeffrey R.10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. MEG Laboratory, Henry Ford Hospital Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA

3. Magnetoencephalography Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center Cleveland Ohio USA

4. Department of Pediatrics University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School Houston Texas USA

5. Division of Pediatric Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

6. Department of Pediatrics University of Alabama Birmingham Alabama USA

7. Institute for Human Neuroscience, Boys Town National Research Hospital Boys Town Nebraska USA

8. Minnesota Epilepsy Group Roseville Minnesota USA

9. Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak Minnesota USA

10. MEG Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractOne of the major challenges of modern epileptology is the underutilization of epilepsy surgery for treatment of patients with focal, medication resistant epilepsy (MRE). Aggravating this distressing failure to deliver optimum care to these patients is the underuse of proven localizing tools, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG), a clinically validated, non‐invasive, neurophysiological method used to directly measure and localize brain activity. A sizable mass of published evidence indicates that MEG can improve identification of surgical candidates and guide pre‐surgical planning, increasing the yield of SEEG and improving operative outcomes. However, despite at least 10 common, evidence supported, clinical scenarios in MRE patients where MEG can offer non‐redundant information and improve the pre‐surgical evaluation, it is regularly used by only a minority of USA epilepsy centers.The current state of the art in MEG sensors employs SQUIDs, which require cooling with liquid helium to achieve superconductivity. This sensor technology has undergone significant generational improvement since whole head MEG scanners were introduced around in 1990s, but still has limitations. Further advances in sensor technology which may make ME G more easily accessible and affordable have been eagerly awaited, and development of new techniques should be encouraged. Of late, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have received considerable attention, even prompting some potential acquisitions of new MEG systems to be put on hold, based on a hope that OPMs will usher in a new generation of MEG equipment and procedures.The development of any new clinical test used to guide intracranial EEG monitoring and/or surgical planning must address several specific issues. The goal of this commentary is to recognize the current state of OPM technology and to suggest a framework for it to advance in the clinical realm where it can eventually be deemed clinically valuable to physicians and patients. The American Clinical MEG Society (ACMEGS) strongly supports more advanced and less expensive technology and looks forward to continuing work with researchers to develop new sensors and clinical devices which will improve the experience and outcome for patients, and perhaps extend the role of MEG. However, currently, there are no OPM devices ready for practical clinical use. Based on the engineering obstacles and the clinical tradeoffs to be resolved, the assessment of experts suggests that there will most likely be another decade relying solely on "frozen SQUIDs" in the clinical MEG field.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3