Association between days alive without life support/out of hospital and health‐related quality of life

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTrials in critically ill patients increasingly focus on days alive without life support (DAWOLS) or days alive out of hospital (DAOOH) and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). DAWOLS and DAOOH convey more information than mortality and are simpler and faster to collect than HRQoL. However, whether these outcomes are associated with HRQoL is uncertain. We thus aimed to assess the associations between DAWOLS and DAOOH and long‐term HRQoL.MethodsSecondary analysis of the COVID STEROID 2 trial including adults with COVID‐19 and severe hypoxaemia and the Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT‐ICU) trial including adult intensive care unit patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Associations between DAWOLS and DAOOH at day 28 and 90 and long‐term HRQoL (after 6 or 12 months) using the EuroQol 5‐dimension 5‐level survey (EQ VAS and EQ‐5D‐5L index values) were assessed using flexible models and evaluated using measures of fit and prediction adequacy in both datasets (comprising internal performance and external validation), non‐parametric correlation coefficients and graphical presentations.ResultsWe found no strong associations between DAWOLS or DAOOH and HRQoL in survivors at HRQoL‐follow‐up (615 and 1476 patients, respectively). There was substantial variability in outcomes, and predictions from the best fitted models were poor both internally and externally in the other trial dataset, which also showed inadequate calibration. Moderate associations were found when including non‐survivors, although predictions remained uncertain and calibration inadequate.ConclusionDAWOLS and DAOOH were poorly associated with HRQoL in adult survivors of severe or critical illness included in the COVID STEROID 2 and HOT‐ICU trials.