Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients: The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan

Author:

Arleth Tobias1ORCID,Baekgaard Josefine1ORCID,Siersma Volkert2ORCID,Klimek Markus3ORCID,Hinkelbein Jochen4ORCID,Rasmussen Lars Simon1ORCID,Steinmetz Jacob15ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

2. The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Anaesthesiology Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

4. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, University Hospital, Ruhr‐University Bochum Minden Germany

5. Danish Air Ambulance Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe international advanced trauma life support guidelines recommend that all severely injured trauma patients receive supplemental oxygen based on very limited evidence. The TRAUMOX2 trial randomises adult trauma patients to a restrictive or liberal oxygen strategy for 8 h. The primary composite outcome consists of 30‐day mortality and/or development of major respiratory complications (pneumonia and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome). This manuscript presents the statistical analysis plan for TRAUMOX2.MethodsPatients are randomised 1:1 in variable block sizes of four, six and eight, stratified by including centre (pre‐hospital base or trauma centre) and tracheal intubation at inclusion. The trial will include 1420 patients to be able to detect a 33% relative risk reduction with the restrictive oxygen strategy of the composite primary outcome with 80% power at the 5% significance level. We will conduct modified intention‐to‐treat analyses on all randomised patients and per‐protocol analyses for the primary composite outcome and key secondary outcomes. The primary composite outcome and two key secondary outcomes will be compared between the two allocated groups using logistic regression reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals adjusted for the stratification variables as in the primary analysis. A p‐value below 5% will be considered statistically significant. A Data Monitoring and Safety Committee has been established to conduct interim analyses after inclusion of 25% and 50% of the patients.ConclusionThis statistical analysis plan of the TRAUMOX2 trial will minimise bias and add transparency to the statistics applied in the analysis of the trial. The results will add evidence on restrictive and liberal supplemental oxygen strategies for trauma patients.Trial RegistrationEudraCT number: 2021–000556‐19; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05146700 (date of registration: 7 December 2021).

Funder

Lundbeckfonden

Novo Nordisk Fonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3