Inter‐rater reliability in the assessment of consciousness in patients receiving palliative care in intensive care: A prospective cross sectional observational study

Author:

Yildirim Dilek1ORCID,Kavala Arzu1ORCID,Değirmenci Öz Seda2ORCID,Sezer Esra3ORCID,Kuğu Emre4ORCID,Coşkun Zeynep5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Istanbul Aydın University Istanbul Turkey

2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Administration Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Zonguldak Turkey

3. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Acibadem University Istanbul Turkey

4. Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Anesthesia Programme Fenerbahçe University Istanbul Turkey

5. Medical Park Florya Hospital Istanbul Aydin University Istanbul Turkey

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is one of the methods that has validity for evaluating the consciousness levels of patients in the literature and is accepted by health authorities.AimThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter‐rater reliability of GCS in intensive care patients receiving palliative care.Study DesignA prospective cross sectional observational study. The study was conducted in a general intensive care unit with 20 beds with patients receiving palliative care. In the unit, 18 nurses worked in two shifts, day and night. Each patient's primary palliative care nurse and two additional researchers were given one minute to independently record the patient's GCS total and subscale scores. All observations were completed within 5 min as there could be significant changes in the patient's GCS score during observations.ResultsA total of 258 assessments were completed. For the GCS total scoring, a moderate agreement was found between palliative care nurses and the first researcher‐observer (49.0%) and also between palliative care nurses and the second researcher‐observer (47.7%). In addition, there was a substantial agreement between the first and second researchers (78.9%) and also between all observers (61.5%) (all p = .001).ConclusionsAlthough there was a near‐perfect agreement between the two researcher‐observers, we found only moderate agreement among all observers (palliative care nurses and two researcher‐observers) in the evaluation of GCS total and subscale scores.Relevance to Clinical PracticeWe found that lack of knowledge and training on the standardized use of GCS is still a problem for palliative and intensive care units. Because of the diversity of patients requiring GCS assessment in palliative care units, refresher training programs and hands‐on workshops on consciousness assessment should be organized regularly for more experienced nurses.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference36 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO).WHO definition of palliative care.2023Accessed 18 March 2023.https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care

2. Palliative care and neurology: Time for a paradigm shift

3. Palliative care after stroke: A review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3