Re‐ensiling effects on inoculated sorghum: Intake, apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance, and animal feeding behaviour
-
Published:2023-04-22
Issue:2
Volume:78
Page:317-325
-
ISSN:0142-5242
-
Container-title:Grass and Forage Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Grass and Forage Science
Author:
Silva Flávia Cristina de Oliveira e1ORCID,
Silva Naiara Taís Alves da1,
Glória Joana Ribeiro da1,
Alves João Carlos de Freitas1,
Borges Ana Luiza da Costa Cruz1,
Gonçalves Lúcio Carlos1ORCID,
Rodrigues José Avelino Santos2,
Jayme Diogo Gonzaga1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Veterinary School Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil
2. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) National Corn and Sorghum Research Center Sete Lagoas Brazil
Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to determine whether using inoculants and re‐ensiling in sorghum silages affect the intake and feeding behaviour, apparent digestibility, digestible energy, and nitrogen balance of sheep in maintenance. Half the sorghum was inoculated on the day of harvest, and the other half received the same inoculation volume but with water. Sorghum was ensiled in 100 experimental metal drum silos of 200 L covered with plastic: 50 silos with inoculants and 50 without them. After 56 days, 25 drums with inoculants and 25 without were exposed to air for 48 h. The other silos remained closed. The treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial scheme with inoculation and re‐ensiling. The sheep received the silages after 211 days of ensiling and 155 days of re‐ensiling to determine the intake, apparent digestibility, and feeding behaviour of animals. The experimental design was a simultaneous double 4 × 4 Latin square. The re‐ensiling process increased silage pH, N‐NH3.TN−1, butyric acid, and propionic acid. The inoculant increased propionic acid in ensiled and re‐ensiled silages. Lactic acid concentration presented a statistical interaction with the inoculated and ensiled silage, 58% higher than the other treatment averages. The ADFap digestibility showed a complex interaction, in which the control ensiled and the inoculated and re‐ensiled silages were about 35% lower than the inoculated ensiled silage. The Nbal:Nint ratio (g.g−1) in the inoculated and re‐ensiled silage had lower nitrogen retention than intake compared with the other treatments. These results indicate that exposing inoculated silages to air does not compromise their use in sheep feeding.
Funder
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Agronomy and Crop Science