Clinical deterioration as a nurse sensitive indicator in the out‐of‐hospital context: A scoping review

Author:

Mccullough Kylie1ORCID,Baker Melanie12ORCID,Bloxsome Dianne1ORCID,Crevacore Carol12ORCID,Davies Hugh1ORCID,Doleman Gemma13ORCID,Gray Michelle1ORCID,Mckay Nilufeur1ORCID,Palamara Peter1ORCID,Richards Gina1ORCID,Saunders Rosemary12ORCID,Towell‐Barnard Amanda123ORCID,Coventry Linda L.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Edith Cowan University Perth Western Australia Australia

2. Centre for Research in Aged Care Edith Cowan University Perth Western Australia Australia

3. Centre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Osborne Park Health Care Group Nedlands Western Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo explore and summarise the literature on the concept of ‘clinical deterioration’ as a nurse‐sensitive indicator of quality of care in the out‐of‐hospital context.DesignThe scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Review and the JBI best practice guidelines for scoping reviews.MethodsStudies focusing on clinical deterioration, errors of omission, nurse sensitive indicators and the quality of nursing and midwifery care for all categories of registered, enrolled, or licensed practice nurses and midwives in the out‐of‐hospital context were included regardless of methodology. Text and opinion papers were also considered. Study protocols were excluded.Data SourcesData bases were searched from inception to June 2022 and included CINAHL, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, EmCare, Maternity and Infant Care Database, Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet, Informit Health and Society Database, JSTOR, Nursing and Allied Health Database, RURAL, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute.ResultsThirty‐four studies were included. Workloads, education and training opportunities, access to technology, home visits, clinical assessments and use of screening tools or guidelines impacted the ability to recognise, relay information and respond to clinical deterioration in the out‐of‐hospital setting.ConclusionsLittle is known about the work of nurses or midwives in out‐of‐hospital settings and their recognition, reaction to and relay of information about patient deterioration. The complex and subtle nature of non‐acute deterioration creates challenges in defining and subsequently evaluating the role and impact of nurses in these settings.Implications for the profession and/or patient careFurther research is needed to clarify outcome measures and nurse contribution to the care of the deteriorating patient in the out‐of‐hospital setting to reduce the rate of avoidable hospitalisation and articulate the contribution of nurses and midwives to patient care.ImpactWhat Problem Did the Study Address?Factors that impact a nurse's ability to recognise, relay information and respond to clinical deterioration in the out‐of‐hospital setting are not examined to date.What Were the Main Findings?A range of factors were identified that impacted a nurse's ability to recognise, relay information and respond to clinical deterioration in the out‐of‐hospital setting including workloads, education and training opportunities, access to technology, home visits, clinical assessments, use of screening tools or guidelines, and avoidable hospitalisation.Where and on whom will the research have an impact?Nurses and nursing management will benefit from understanding the factors that act as barriers and facilitators for effective recognition of, and responding to, a deteriorating patient in the out‐of‐hospital setting. This in turn will impact patient survival and satisfaction.Reporting MethodThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Review guidelines guided this review. The PRISMA‐Scr Checklist (Tricco et al., 2018) is included as (supplementary file 1).Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.”No Patient or Public ContributionNot required as the Scoping Review used publicly available information.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Reference77 articles.

1. AIHW. (2019).Potentially preventable hospitalisations in Australia by age groups and small geographic areas 2017–18. Retrieved 23 March fromhttps://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/primary‐health‐care/potentially‐preventable‐hospitalisations/contents/about

2. AIHW. (2020).Australia's health 2020: Primary health care. Retrieved 11 April fromhttps://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias‐health/primary‐health‐care

3. A scoping review—Missed nursing care in community healthcare contexts and how it is measured

4. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in health Care. (2021).Accreditation of health service organsiations: Key actions for consumers.https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Fact‐sheet‐2‐Accreditation‐of‐health‐services‐in‐Australia.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3