Children's and young people's experiences of expressing their views and having them heard in health care: A deductive qualitative content analysis

Author:

Davies Clare1ORCID,Waters Donna1,Fraser Jennifer1

Affiliation:

1. Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo gain an understanding of children's experiences of expressing their views and having them heard in Australian healthcare settings.DesignChild‐centred qualitative research. A deductive qualitative content analysis was undertaken.MethodsData were collected from 20 Australian children and young people between the ages of 7 and 18 years old using the ‘draw, write and tell’ method.ResultsChildren's experiences of ‘space’ and ‘voice’, and therefore the opportunity to express their views in health care were, in the main, positive. At the same time, their experiences of ‘audience’ and ‘influence’, the situations in which those views are given due weight, were overwhelmingly described as negative.ConclusionAustralian paediatric health services appear to have responded to calls to provide children with the opportunity to express their views and thus are delivering on the elements of ‘space’ and ‘voice’, whereas the realisation of ‘audience’ and ‘influence’ has some way to go. Due weight is not always given to children's views.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe Lundy model can be used to facilitate a better understanding of the concept of voice, and the responsibility of health organisations in implementing the rights of children and young people, as articulated in Article 12.Impact Children and young people have a right to express their views and have them heard in health care, but their experiences in Australian health care are unknown. While children's experiences of expressing their views in health care were mostly positive, their views are not always taken seriously or given due weight. This research impacts child health professionals in Australia and internationally. Reporting MethodThe study is reported using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).Patient or Public ContributionMembers of the Youth Advisory Council of two tertiary children's hospitals were consulted and invited to become members of the research team.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Reference48 articles.

1. Children's perspective on their right to participate in decision-making according to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child article 12

2. ‘Draw, write and tell’: A literature review and methodological development on the ‘draw and write’ research method

3. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies AIATSIS. (2020).AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research.https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020‐10/aiatsis‐guide‐applying‐code‐ethics_0.pdf

4. I’m not a diagnosis: Adolescents’ perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3