Coping profiles and their association with vicarious post‐traumatic growth among nurses during the three waves of the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author:

Kalaitzaki Argyroula123ORCID,Theodoratou Maria45,Tsouvelas George26ORCID,Tamiolaki Alexandra12,Konstantakopoulos George78

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Work Hellenic Mediterranean University Heraklion Greece

2. Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Approaches for the Enhancement of Quality of Life, School of Health Sciences Hellenic Mediterranean University Heraklion Greece

3. Institute of AgriFood and Life Sciences Hellenic Mediterranean University Heraklion Greece

4. School of Humanistic Sciences Hellenic Open University Pafos Cyprus

5. School of Health Sciences Neapolis University of Pafos Pafos Cyprus

6. Department of Nursing University of West Attica Thessaloniki Greece

7. Department of Psychiatry National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital Athens Greece

8. Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology University College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractAimsThis study aimed to examine (a) changes in coping strategies and vicarious post‐traumatic growth (VPTG) across three timepoints of the COVID‐19 pandemic among nurses; (b) discrete groups of nurses with unique coping profiles and (c) the association of these coping profiles with VPTG across the timepoints.BackgroundAlthough literature abounds with the negative mental health consequences of the pandemic among healthcare professionals, much less is known about the positive consequences on nurses, the coping strategies that they use, and how these change over time.DesignThis was a cross‐sectional web‐based survey at three timepoints during the pandemic.MethodsA sample of 429 nurses completed online the Post‐Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) and the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (COPE) to measure vicarious post‐traumatic growth (VPTG) and coping strategies, respectively. The STROBE checklist was used to report the present study.ResultsSignificantly higher VPTG scores were observed during the third timepoint. Different coping strategies were employed across the three timepoints. Nurses responded to the pandemic either with an active, an avoidant or a passive coping profile. Significantly higher VPTG levels were reported by the nurses of the active profile compared to those of the passive profile, whereas the difference between active and avoidant profiles was not significant.ConclusionsNotwithstanding the preponderance of the nurses with the active coping profile in achieving high VPTG, the avoidant copers had more gains (VPTG) than the passive copers, suggesting that doing something to cope with the stressor—let it be trying to avoid it—was better than doing nothing.Relevance to Clinical PracticeThe identification of distinct coping profiles among nurses and their association with VPTG is of particular use to policymakers and practitioners in developing tailored prevention and intervention efforts to help the nurses effectively manage the demands of the pandemic.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution since the study was exclusively conducted by the authors.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3