The evaluation of an online nurse‐assisted eye‐screening tool in older adults receiving home healthcare

Author:

Elsman Ellen B. M.12ORCID,Lee Shan Qi1,van der Aa Hilde P. A.13,van Nassau Femke34,Wisse Robert P. L.5ORCID,Maarsingh Otto R.67,Keunen Jan E. E.8,van Rens Ger H. M. B.1,van Nispen Ruth M. A.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ophthalmology Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

2. Quality of Care Amsterdam Public Health Amsterdam the Netherlands

3. Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases Amsterdam Public Health Amsterdam the Netherlands

4. Public and Occupational Health Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

5. Ophthalmology UMC Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

6. General Practice Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

7. Aging & Later Life Amsterdam Public Health Amsterdam the Netherlands

8. Ophthalmology Radboud UMC Nijmegen the Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo investigate the agreement between an online nurse‐assisted eye‐screening tool and reference tests in older adults receiving home healthcare and to collect user experiences.MethodsOlder adults (65+) receiving home healthcare were included. Home healthcare nurses assisted in administering the eye‐screening tool at participants' homes. Approximately 2 weeks later, a researcher administered reference tests at participants' homes. Experiences from participants and home healthcare nurses were collected. Agreement in outcomes (distance and near visual acuity, with the latter being measured using two different optotypes, and macular problems) between the eye‐screening tool and reference clinical testing was compared. A difference of less than ±0.15 logMAR was considered acceptable.ResultsA total of 40 participants were included. Here, we describe the results for the right eye; results for the left eye were similar. The mean difference between the eye‐screening tool and reference tests for distance visual acuity was 0.02 logMAR. The mean difference between the eye‐screening tool and reference tests using two different optotypes for near visual acuity was 0.06 and 0.03 logMAR, respectively. The majority of the individual data points were within the ±0.15 logMAR threshold (75%, 51% and 58%, respectively). The agreement between tests for macular problems was 75%. Participants and home healthcare nurses were generally satisfied with the eye‐screening tool, although remarks for further improvements were made.ConclusionsThe eye‐screening tool is promising for nurse‐assisted eye screening in older adults receiving home healthcare, with the mostly satisfactory agreement. After implementing the eye‐screening tool in practice, cost‐effectiveness needs to be investigated.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sensory Systems,Optometry,Ophthalmology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3