A comparison of the EU regulatory approach to directed mutagenesis with that of other jurisdictions, consequences for international trade and potential steps forward-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparison of the EU regulatory approach to directed mutagenesis with that of other jurisdictions, consequences for international trade and potential steps forward

Published:2019-01-16 Issue:4 Volume:222 Page:1673-1684
ISSN:0028-646X
Container-title:New Phytologist
language:en
Short-container-title:New Phytol

Author:

Eriksson Dennis¹^ORCID,Kershen Drew²,Nepomuceno Alexandre³,Pogson Barry J.⁴,Prieto Humberto⁵,Purnhagen Kai⁶⁷,Smyth Stuart⁸,Wesseler Justus⁹,Whelan Agustina¹⁰¹¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plant Breeding Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 101 230 53 Alnarp Sweden

2. College of Law University of Oklahoma 300 Timberdell Road Norman OK 73019‐5081 USA

3. Brazilian Agricultural Research Cooperation – Embrapa Brazilian Biosafety Technical Commission – CTNBio PO Box 231 ZIP 86001‐970 Londrina PR Brazil

4. Global Plant Council and ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology Australian National University Canberra 2601 ACT Australia

5. Biotechnology Laboratory La Platina Station Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias Santa Rosa 11610, La Pintana Santiago de Chile Chile

6. Law and Governance Group Department of Social Sciences Wageningen University Hollandseweg 1 6706 KN Wageningen the Netherlands

7. Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics, Law School Erasmus University of Rotterdam Burg. Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam the Netherlands

8. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Saskatchewan 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon Sask., S7N 5A8 Canada

9. Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group Department of Social Sciences Wageningen University Hollandseweg 1 6706 KN Wageningen the Netherlands

10. Biotechnology Directorate Ministry of AgroIndustry Buenos Aires Argentina

11. National University of Quilmes Bernal Argentina

Funder

Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Physiology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/nph.15627

Reference98 articles.

1. Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities

2. AG Bobek.2018.Opinion of Advocate General Bobek Case C‐528/16 delivered on 18 January 2018. [WWW document] URLhttp://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=198532&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=417388[accessed 19 June 2018].

3. Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System

4. The impact of agricultural biotechnology on supply and land-use

Cited by 98 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. European soybean to benefit people and the environment;Scientific Reports;2024-03-31

2. Maximising soybean productivity with late maturity groups in Mediterranean irrigated systems;Field Crops Research;2024-03

3. Mutagenesis: Exploring Genetic Diversity of Industrial Crop Plants;Interdisciplinary Biotechnological Advances;2024

4. How Are Gene Editing Technologies Regulated in the Agrifood System?;SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science;2024

5. Introduction: Why Study the Governance of Gene Edited Agrifoods?;SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science;2024