Results, Rhetoric, and Randomized Trials: The Case of Donepezil-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Results, Rhetoric, and Randomized Trials: The Case of Donepezil

Published:2008-08 Issue:8 Volume:56 Page:1556-1562
ISSN:0002-8614
Container-title:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Gilstad John R.,Finucane Thomas E.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01844.x/fullpdf

Reference31 articles.

1. Alzheimer's disease;Cummings;N Engl J Med,2004

2. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with alzheimer's disease;Kaduszkiewicz;Systematic review of randomised clinical trials,2005

3. Practice parameter;Doody;Management of dementia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology,2001

4. Strategies of influence in medical authorship;Segal;Soc Sci Med,1993

5. The rhetoric of research;Horton;BMJ,1995

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Conflicts of Interest Between Neurologists and Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industries;Integrity of Scientific Research;2022

2. Financial Conflicts of Interest of United States–Based Authors in Neurology Journals;Neurology;2021-02-25

3. Study of the strength of the evidence and the redundancy of the research on pharmacological treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: a cumulative meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis;European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology;2019-08-21

4. Scope and nature of financial conflicts of interest between neurologists and industry;Neurology;2019-08-05

5. Ethical Issues Pertaining to Conflicts of Interest Between Neurologists and the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industries;Seminars in Neurology;2018-10