Medication changes implemented during medication reviews and factors related to deprescribing: Posthoc analyses of a randomized clinical trial in geriatric outpatients with polypharmacy

Author:

Kornholt Jonatan1ORCID,Feizi Shafika Tapia2,Hansen Alexandra Storm1,Laursen Jannie Thaysen1,Johansson Karl Sebastian1,Reuther Lene Ørskov13,Petersen Tonny Studsgaard13,Pressel Eckart2,Christensen Mikkel Bring1345

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. Herlev and Gentofte, Center for Clinical Metabolic Research Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

5. Center for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AimsTo provide posthoc analyses of a clinical trial that reported beneficial effects of medication reviews on health‐related quality of life. Specifically, to describe the medication changes with a focus on deprescribing and to explore patient‐ and medication‐related factors that may identify patients most likely to benefit from medication reviews.MethodsPosthoc analyses of data from a pragmatic, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial investigating a medication review intervention (NCT03911934) in 408 geriatric outpatients treated with ≥9 medicines.ResultsIn the medication review group (n = 196), 26% of the medicines prescribed at baseline were discontinued with 82% still being discontinued after 13 months. The most common reason for discontinuation was lack of indication (72% of discontinuations). The medicines most often discontinued in the medication review group compared with usual care included: metoclopramide (11/15 = 73% discontinued vs. 1/12 = 8% in usual care), acetylsalicylic acid (20/48 = 42% vs. 2/47 = 4%), simvastatin (18/48 = 38% vs. 2/58 = 3%), zopiclone (23/59 = 39% vs. 4/54 = 7%), quinine (9/14 = 64% vs. 6/16 = 38%), citalopram (4/18 = 22% vs. 0/20 = 0%) and tramadol (18/37 = 49% vs. 8/30 = 27%). Factors associated with number of deprescribed medicines included: number of prescribed medicines, Drug Burden Index, patient motivation for medicine changes, and prescriptions of metoclopramide, iron preparations, antidepressants other than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, or drugs for urinary incontinence.ConclusionPhysician‐led medication reviews resulted in persistent deprescribing of medicines in older polypharmacy patients treated with ≥9 medicines. Motivation for having their medicine changed, treatment with more medicines, and a higher burden of sedative and anticholinergic medicines characterized the patients most likely to benefit from physician‐led medication reviews.

Funder

Region Hovedstaden

Velux Fonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3