Effectiveness of integrated person‐centered interventions for older people's care: Review of Swedish experiences and experts’ perspective

Author:

Kirvalidze Mariam1ORCID,Boström Anne‐Marie234ORCID,Liljas Ann15,Doheny Megan1,Hendry Anne67,McCormack Brendan8,Fratiglioni Laura19,Ali Sulin1510,Ebrahimi Zahra11,Elmståhl Sölve12,Eriksdotter Maria313,Gläske Pascal1510,Gustafsson Lena‐Karin14,Rundgren Åsa Hedberg9,Hvitfeldt Helena15,Lennartsson Carin116,Hammar Lena Marmstål1718,Nilsson Gunnar H19,Nilsson Peter20,Öhlén Joakim1121,Sandgren Anna22,Söderman Annika23,Swedberg Karl24,Vackerberg Nicoline25,Vetrano Davide Liborio19,Wijk Helle112627,Agerholm Janne15,Calderón‐Larrañaga Amaia19ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Aging Research Center Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University Solna Sweden

2. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Division of Nursing Karolinska Institutet Huddinge Sweden

3. Theme Inflammation and Aging Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

4. Research and Development Unit Stockholms Sjukhem Stockholm Sweden

5. Department of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet Solna Sweden

6. International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC) Glasgow Scotland UK

7. School of Health and Life Sciences University of the West of Scotland Glasgow Scotland UK

8. Faculty of Medicine and Health Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery Sydney Nursing School The University of Sydney Sydney Australia

9. Stockholm Gerontology Research Center Stockholm Sweden

10. Institute for Sociology University of Duisburg‐Essen Duisburg Germany

11. Institute of Health and Care Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Centre for Person‐Centred Care – GPCC Gothenburg Sweden

12. Department of Clinical Sciences Division of Geriatric Medicine Lund University Lund Sweden

13. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics Karolinska Institutet Huddinge Sweden

14. School of Health, Care and Social Welfare Mälardalen University Eskilstuna Sweden

15. Norrtälje Hospital, Vårdbolaget Tiohundra Stockholm Sweden

16. Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI) Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden

17. School of Health, Care and Social Welfare Mälardalen University Västerås Sweden

18. School of Health and Welfare Dalarna University Falun Sweden

19. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care Karolinska Institutet Huddinge Sweden

20. Myndigheten för vård‐ och omsorgsanalys Stockholm Sweden

21. Palliative Care Centre Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

22. Center for Collaborative Palliative Care Department of Health and Caring Sciences Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden

23. Faculty of Medicine and Health School of Health Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden

24. Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

25. Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden

26. Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden

27. Department of Quality Assurance and Patient Safety Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

Abstract

AbstractOlder adults have multiple medical and social care needs, requiring a shift toward an integrated person‐centered model of care. Our objective was to describe and summarize Swedish experiences of integrated person‐centered care by reviewing studies published between 2000 and 2023, and to identify the main challenges and scientific gaps through expert discussions. Seventy‐three publications were identified by searching MEDLINE and contacting experts. Interventions were categorized using two World Health Organization frameworks: (1) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), and (2) Integrated People‐Centered Health Services (IPCHS). The included 73 publications were derived from 31 unique and heterogeneous interventions pertaining mainly to the micro‐ and meso‐levels. Among publications measuring mortality, 15% were effective. Subjective health outcomes showed improvement in 24% of publications, morbidity outcomes in 42%, disability outcomes in 48%, and service utilization outcomes in 58%. Workshop discussions in Stockholm (Sweden), March 2023, were recorded, transcribed, and summarized. Experts emphasized: (1) lack of rigorous evaluation methods, (2) need for participatory designs, (3) scarcity of macro‐level interventions, and (4) importance of transitioning from person‐ to people‐centered integrated care. These challenges could explain the unexpected weak beneficial effects of the interventions on health outcomes, whereas service utilization outcomes were more positively impacted. Finally, we derived a list of recommendations, including the need to engage care organizations in interventions from their inception and to leverage researchers’ scientific expertise. Although this review provides a comprehensive snapshot of interventions in the context of Sweden, the findings offer transferable perspectives on the real‐world challenges encountered in this field.

Funder

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3