Affiliation:
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University Giza Egypt
2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine Beni‐Suef University Beni‐Suef Egypt
3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Modern University for Technology & Information Cairo Egypt
4. The Head of Oral Surgery Division School Of Dentistry, New Giza University Giza Egypt
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe cortical shell technique is frequently associated with technical drawbacks, such as the lack of anatomical guidance during shell harvest and graft. This study aims to assess the horizontal bone gain and accuracy of a digitalized protocol that incorporates two interlocking patient‐specific stackable guides (PSSGs) to control the shell harvest, positioning, and fixation.Patients and MethodsTwenty patients with deficient anterior mandibles were randomly allocated; 10 patients received freehand symphyseal shell harvest and fixation (the control group), whereas the other 10 received fully guided harvest and graft (study group) using (PSSGs), the first aided an accurate shell harvest, whereas the second conveyed shell fixation. The interposition gap among both groups was loaded with an equal mix of xenogeneic and autogenous particulates. The mean radiographic bone gain among both groups was calibrated 6 months postoperatively, and the accuracy of the digital plan was assessed by superimposing and comparing the virtually planned horizontal bone dimensions with the immediate postoperative actual bone dimensions.ResultsThe mean 6‐month postoperative horizontal bone gain value of the study group was recorded as (4.97 ± 0.73) mm versus (4.45 ± 0.61) mm for the control group, with a statistically insignificant mean gain difference of (0.52) mm, (p = 0.101). The mean virtual preplanned horizontal bone gain was recorded (5.4 ± 0.6) versus (5.4 ± 0.6) for the immediate postoperative actual bone gain, which was also statistically insignificant (p = 0.9).ConclusionThe (PSSGs) provided a precise method for graft harvest, position, and fixation, resulting in satisfactory alveolar ridge dimensions with intimate accuracy.
Reference16 articles.
1. Tangl atrophy of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth loss in a historical population;Reich KM;Oral Dis,2011
2. Ridge augmentation is a prerequisite for successful implant placement: a literature review;Anilkumar R;Cureus,2022
3. Bone augmentation techniques for horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge deficiency in oral implantology;Tolstunov L;Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am,2019
4. The three‐dimensional reconstruction of the alveolar crest with mandibular bone block graft: a clinical study;Khoury F;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2004
5. Intraoral onlay block bone grafts versus cortical tenting technique on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review;Aloy‐Prósper A;Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2022