Digital workflow for graft harvest and positioning in deficient anterior mandibles versus conventional technique: Randomized controlled trial

Author:

Sakr Mohamed Ibrahim1,Hanafy Mahmoud1,Gibaly Amr23ORCID,Mounir Mohamed14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University Giza Egypt

2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine Beni‐Suef University Beni‐Suef Egypt

3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Modern University for Technology & Information Cairo Egypt

4. The Head of Oral Surgery Division School Of Dentistry, New Giza University Giza Egypt

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe cortical shell technique is frequently associated with technical drawbacks, such as the lack of anatomical guidance during shell harvest and graft. This study aims to assess the horizontal bone gain and accuracy of a digitalized protocol that incorporates two interlocking patient‐specific stackable guides (PSSGs) to control the shell harvest, positioning, and fixation.Patients and MethodsTwenty patients with deficient anterior mandibles were randomly allocated; 10 patients received freehand symphyseal shell harvest and fixation (the control group), whereas the other 10 received fully guided harvest and graft (study group) using (PSSGs), the first aided an accurate shell harvest, whereas the second conveyed shell fixation. The interposition gap among both groups was loaded with an equal mix of xenogeneic and autogenous particulates. The mean radiographic bone gain among both groups was calibrated 6 months postoperatively, and the accuracy of the digital plan was assessed by superimposing and comparing the virtually planned horizontal bone dimensions with the immediate postoperative actual bone dimensions.ResultsThe mean 6‐month postoperative horizontal bone gain value of the study group was recorded as (4.97 ± 0.73) mm versus (4.45 ± 0.61) mm for the control group, with a statistically insignificant mean gain difference of (0.52) mm, (p = 0.101). The mean virtual preplanned horizontal bone gain was recorded (5.4 ± 0.6) versus (5.4 ± 0.6) for the immediate postoperative actual bone gain, which was also statistically insignificant (p = 0.9).ConclusionThe (PSSGs) provided a precise method for graft harvest, position, and fixation, resulting in satisfactory alveolar ridge dimensions with intimate accuracy.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference16 articles.

1. Tangl atrophy of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth loss in a historical population;Reich KM;Oral Dis,2011

2. Ridge augmentation is a prerequisite for successful implant placement: a literature review;Anilkumar R;Cureus,2022

3. Bone augmentation techniques for horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge deficiency in oral implantology;Tolstunov L;Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am,2019

4. The three‐dimensional reconstruction of the alveolar crest with mandibular bone block graft: a clinical study;Khoury F;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2004

5. Intraoral onlay block bone grafts versus cortical tenting technique on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review;Aloy‐Prósper A;Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3