Efficacy and safety of once‐weekly versus once‐daily basal insulin analogues in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Karakasis Paschalis1ORCID,Patoulias Dimitrios23ORCID,Pamporis Konstantinos4,Popovic Djordje S.5ORCID,Stachteas Panagiotis1,Bougioukas Konstantinos I.4,Fragakis Nikolaos1,Rizzo Manfredi6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Second Department of Cardiology Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital “Hippokration” Thessaloniki Greece

2. Outpatient Department of Cardiometabolic Medicine Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital “Hippokration” Thessaloniki Greece

3. Second Department of Internal Medicine European Interbalkan Medical Center Thessaloniki Greece

4. Department of Hygiene Social‐Preventive Medicine & Medical Statistics, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus Thessaloniki Greece

5. Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad Novi Sad Serbia

6. Department of Health Promotion Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Palermo Palermo Italy

Abstract

AbstractAimTo summarize the evidence of recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying efficacy, in terms of glycaemic control, and safety of the newly developed once‐weekly basal insulin analogues.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted through Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar until June 30, 2023. Double‐independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Results were summarized with random‐effects meta‐analysis.ResultsA total of 3962 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among nine RCTs were analysed. All RCTs had low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration risk‐of‐bias tool (RoB2). Once‐weekly insulins demonstrated better efficacy in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction (mean difference [MD] −0.13%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.23, −0.03; P = 0.08) and a significantly greater time in range compared with once‐daily insulin analogues (MD 3.54%, 95% CI 1.56, 5.53; P = 0.005). Based on subgroup analyses, the reduction in HbA1c and the odds of achieving an end‐of‐treatment HbA1c <6.5% were significantly greater for icodec compared to the once‐daily insulin (MD −0.18%, 95% CI −0.27, −0.09 [P < 0.001] and odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.34, 2.29 [P < 0.001], respectively). Once‐weekly insulins were associated with higher odds of level 1 hypoglycaemia during the 24‐hour period (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.04, 1.64; P = 0.02) but were safer in terms of level 2 or 3 nocturnal hypoglycaemic events (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56, 0.97; P = 0.03). No difference was observed regarding serious adverse events between the two groups.ConclusionThe once‐weekly basal insulin analogues seem to be at least equally efficient in glycaemic management and safe compared to once‐daily injections in people with T2DM. Phase 4 RCTs are expected to shed further light on the effectiveness and safety of once‐weekly insulin therapy over the long term.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. IDF DIABETES ATLAS.[Internet] – PubMed. n.d.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35914061/(accessed May 26 2023)

2. Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

3. Effect of a Multifactorial Intervention on Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3