Proton pump inhibitors for gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: A systematic review protocol

Author:

Wang Ying1ORCID,Heels‐Ansdell Diane1,Ge Long2,Parpia Sameer3ORCID,Ibrahim Quazi1,Cook Deborah14,Deane Adam5,Lauzier Francois67,Hammond Naomi89,Møller Morten H.1011,Krag Mette1012,Perner Anders1011,Guyatt Gordon H.14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

2. Evidence Based Social Science Research Center School of Public Health, Lanzhou University Lanzhou China

3. Department of Oncology McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

4. Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

5. Department of Critical Care Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

6. Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma—Emergency—Critical Care Medicine) CHU de Québec‐Université Laval Research Centre Québec City Québec Canada

7. Department of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Université Laval Québec Québec Canada

8. Critical Care Program The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

9. Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care Royal North Shore Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

10. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

11. Department of Intensive Care Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

12. Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most commonly prescribed drugs for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. However, concerns have arisen about the possible harms of using PPIs, including potentially increased risk of pneumonia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and more seriously, an increased risk of death in the most severely ill patients. Triggered by the REVISE trial, which is a forthcoming large randomized trial comparing pantoprazole to placebo in invasively mechanically ventilated patients, we will conduct this systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PPIs versus no prophylaxis for critically ill patients.MethodsWe will systematically search randomized trials that compared gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis with PPIs versus placebo or no prophylaxis in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU). Pairs of reviewers will independently screen the literature, and for those eligible trials, extract data and assess risk of bias. We will perform meta‐analyses using a random‐effects model, and calculate relative risks for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes, and the associated 95% confidence intervals. We will conduct subgroup analysis to explore whether the impact of PPIs on mortality differs in more and less severely ill patients. We will assess certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.DiscussionThis systematic review will provide the most up‐to‐date evidence regarding the merits and limitations of stress ulcer prophylaxis with PPIs in critically ill patients in contemporary practice.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3