Development and evaluation of a list of high‐risk inpatient procedures in patients 65 years and older

Author:

Shah Samir K.1ORCID,Xiang Lingwei2,Manful Adoma3,Shah Mihir M.4ORCID,Sharma Gaurav5,Adler Rachel R.2,Weissman Joel S.26

Affiliation:

1. Division of Vascular Surgery University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

2. Center for Surgery and Public Health Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

3. School of Medicine Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee USA

4. Division of Surgical Oncology Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

5. Division of Vascular Surgery Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara California USA

6. Surgery Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundInpatient procedures are common and important health events for older Americans. To facilitate surgical outcomes research, we sought to create and evaluate lists of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD‐10) codes for high‐risk inpatient procedures, defined as having at least a 1% inpatient mortality.MethodsThis retrospective national cohort study analyzes Medicare claims from 2018 for patients 65 years and older undergoing inpatient procedures. Surgical Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) codes in the inpatient claims were used to identify procedures. We identified the primary ICD‐10 procedure code for each patient and then compiled all codes with at least a 1% inpatient mortality yielding three separate lists: one list that was blind to elective versus urgent/emergent status, and one each for urgent/emergent and elective procedures. Clinical review by three surgeons was used to remove procedures unlikely to be the proximate cause of mortality. For evaluation, we examined the mortality of each code among fee‐for‐service Medicare beneficiaries in 2017, 2019, and 2020 to determine how many of these satisfied the 1% mortality criterion.ResultsThis study included 2,241,419 patients from 2018 undergoing inpatient procedures. The final result included 231 (blind to elective vs urgent/emergent status), 167 (urgent/emergent status), and 119 (elective status) ICD‐10 procedure codes for the three lists. Our evaluation from 2017, 2019, and 2020 demonstrated that in our master list, which was blind to elective versus urgent/emergent status, 97.8% of procedures had an inpatient mortality of at least 1%. In our high‐risk procedures lists for urgent/emergent and elective procedures, 100% and 94.1% of codes met this requirement.ConclusionsWe developed and evaluated lists of ICD‐10 codes representing high‐risk procedures in patients 65 years and older. These lists will be powerful tools for researchers studying surgical outcomes.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3