From alcohol and other drug treatment mediator to mechanism to implementation: A systematic review and the cases of self‐efficacy, social support, and craving

Author:

Maisto Stephen A.1ORCID,Moskal Dezarie2,Firkey Madison K.1ORCID,Bergman Brandon G.3ORCID,Borsari Brian4,Hallgren Kevin A.5ORCID,Houck Jon M.6ORCID,Hurlocker Margo6ORCID,Kiluk Brian D.7ORCID,Kuerbis Alexis8,Reid Allecia E.9,Magill Molly10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Syracuse University Syracuse New York USA

2. VA Center for Integrated Healthcare, VA Western New York Healthcare System Buffalo USA

3. Harvard University Boston USA

4. University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco USA

5. University of Washington Seattle USA

6. University of New Mexico Albuquerque USA

7. Yale University New Haven USA

8. Hunter University New York USA

9. University of Massachusetts Amherst USA

10. Brown University Providence USA

Abstract

AbstractResearch designed to establish alcohol and other drug (AOD) mechanisms of behavioral change (MOBC) has centered on what variables mediate the relation between AOD treatment and outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to review this research evidence to identify empirically supported mediators of alcohol and other drug use and related outcomes and then to evaluate their potential as being AOD treatment MOBC. The first phase was a systematic review of reviews (2008–2023) to identify the variables with the strongest empirical support as mediators of AOD treatment effects. Eligible reviews focused on AOD treatment modalities, included empirically tested mediators, and targeted adult samples. The second phase was a systematic review of empirical studies (1990–2023) testing the hypothesis that variables identified in phase one were AOD treatment mediators/mechanisms and then evaluating each eligible stage two study according to the Kazdin and Nock (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1116) criteria. Eligible articles included empirical studies with adult samples attending AOD treatment and empirically tested one of the three treatment mechanisms as a mediator of an AOD‐related outcome. Databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses. This systematic review was not preregistered. The first review of 11 eligible review articles identified self‐efficacy, social support, and craving as having the strongest empirical support. The second review captured 48 individual studies. An evaluation of each of these studies by the Kazdin and Nock criteria suggested that they likely are MOBC and therefore are ready for implementation. The implementation of self‐efficacy, social support, and craving into clinical practice and training is warranted. Six directions for future research to solidify and generalize empirical support for the case that self‐efficacy, social support, and craving are MOBC are presented, as are five implications for clinical practice and training.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3