Impaired or not impaired: The accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in detecting cognitive impairment among patients with alcohol use disorder

Author:

Høiland Kristoffer1ORCID,Arnevik Espen Kristian Ajo23,Diep Lien My4,Mathisen Tove5,Witkiewitz Katie67ORCID,Egeland Jens13

Affiliation:

1. Vestfold Hospital Trust Tønsberg Norway

2. Section for Clinical Addiction Research Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

3. Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway

4. Oslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology (OCBE) University of Oslo Oslo Norway

5. Blue Cross Clinic Skien Skien Norway

6. Department of Psychology University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA

7. Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCognitive impairments are common in alcohol use disorder (AUD), but only a few studies have investigated the accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in this population. We examined the accuracy and precision of the MoCA in detecting cognitive impairment in a sample of patients with AUD. In addition, we investigated whether the MoCA predicts premature discontinuation from treatment.MethodA sample of 126 persons with AUD undergoing treatment in specialist health services were administered the MoCA and a battery of 12 neuropsychological tests. Five cognitive domains were derived from the reference tests. A composite total score from these tests was used as a reference criterion for determining correct and incorrect classifications for the MoCA. We analyzed the optimal cut‐off score for the MoCA and the accuracy and agreement of classification between the MoCA and the reference tests.ResultsReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyzes yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (95% CI [0.67, 0.87]). Applying 25 as the cut‐off, MoCA sensitivity was 0.77 and specificity 0.62. The PPV was 0.53. The NPV was 0.84. Using a cut‐off score of 24 yielded a lower sensitivity 0.60, but specificity was significantly better i.e., 0.79. PPV was 0.68. The NPV was 0.82. Kappa agreement between MoCA and the reference tests was fair to moderate, 0.38 for the cut‐off of 25, and 0.44 for the cut‐off of 24. MoCA did not predict discontinuation from treatment.ConclusionsOur findings indicate limitations in the classification accuracy of the MoCA in predicting cognitive impairment in AUD. Achieving the right balance between accurately identifying impaired cases without including too many false positives can be challenging. Further, MoCA does not predict discontinuation from treatment. Overall, the results do not support MoCA as a time‐efficient screening instrument.

Funder

Sykehuset i Vestfold

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3