Could “Lehman Sisters” reduce bank risk‐taking? International evidence

Author:

Hoang Anh12,Wu Qiongbing1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Business Western Sydney University Parramatta New South Wales Australia

2. Faculty of Economics and Management Thuyloi University Hanoi Vietnam

Abstract

AbstractResearch question/issueSince the global financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, board gender diversity has attracted growing attention among academia and policy makers. The “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis argues for more female representation on bank director boards based on the stereotyped gender gap in risk preference, which has been widely supported by empirical studies on nonfinancial firms. However, due to the constraint of data unavailability, empirical research on board gender diversity and bank risk‐taking is relatively scarce and mostly confined to individual developed markets with inconclusive findings. In this paper, we examine the impact of board gender diversity on bank risk‐taking using a large hand‐collected dataset covering 480 commercial banks across 18 developed and 21 developing countries over the period 2007–2016.Research findings/insightsWe find that lower bank risk‐taking is associated with greater board gender diversity, supporting the “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis in the international context; however, this effect is significantly weakened in countries with more hostile perception toward working women. We also confirm the critical threshold of three female directors to play a significant role in reducing bank risk‐taking, providing novel international evidence in support of the critical mass theory from the banking sector.Theoretical/academic implicationsOur findings help to reconcile existing contradictory empirical evidence from different countries by highlighting the importance of cultural effects.Practitioner/policy implicationsWe provide the first international empirical evidence in support of the policies aimed to promote representation of women on director boards, particularly in the banking sector. We confirm that a critical mass number of female directors on a bank board is important to avoid the tokenism problem. In countries with less support toward working women, policy makers also need to work on improving the overall working environment for women in order to achieve the expected outcome.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3