In vivo evaluation of T‐Scan in quantifying occlusal contact

Author:

Wang Qing12ORCID,Zhao Zhe1,Li Jiale1,Zhao Ruifeng3,Zhou Ming1,Tang Kai1,Bai Shizhu3,Ma Chufan4,Wang Fu1

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology The Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an PR China

2. Department of Prosthodontics Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital Hohhot Inner Mongolia PR China

3. State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Digital Dentistry Center, School of Stomatology The Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an PR China

4. Department of Stomatology, Air Force Medical Center The Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an PR China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe T‐scan system has been used previously to analyse occlusion, but the quantitative analysis of occlusal contact by T‐Scan system has yet to be reported.ObjectivesTo evaluate the reliability and validity of T‐Scan system for quantitatively measuring occlusal contact area and occlusal contact number.MethodsTwenty‐two individuals with normal occlusion, 11 men and 11 women, were recruited for the study. Two occlusal analysis methods, including silicone transmission analysis method (STA) and T‐Scan occlusion analysis method (TSO), were used to make quantitative analysis to measure occlusal contact area (OCA) and occlusal contact number (OCN). A test–retest check was performed with an interval of 2 weeks. The values of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between test‐retest of each method were calculated for reliability evaluation. Pearson correlations analysis, paired t‐tests, regression analysis and Bland–Altman analysis were performed for validity evaluation.ResultsThe ICC values of STA were greater than those of TSO for OCA while for OCN, ICC values of TSO were greater than STA. The higher OCA and OCN values were found in TSO compared with STA. Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated strong relations between TSO and STA (0.730–0.812) for OCA, while good relations between then (0.569–0.583) for OCN. Paired t‐test showed a significant difference between the OCA and OCN values between TSO and STA. Bland–Altman analysis showed good agreement between OCA and OCN values of TSO and STA both in men and women. Regression analysis identified a linear correlation between OCA values obtained from these two methods.ConclusionsT‐Scan method showed strong reliability for measuring OCA and OCN quantitatively. Strong correlations were found between OCA values from TSO and STA method, but the validity of TSO for measuring OCN needs to be promoted.Clinical SignificanceT‐Scan system demonstrates good potential in quantitative analysis of occlusion, which will expand its clinical application.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3