Affiliation:
1. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM) Alma Mater University of Bologna Bologna Italy
2. Unit of Occupational Medicine IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna Bologna Italy
3. Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale‐IRCCS di Reggio Emilia Reggio Emilia Italy
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundMyogenic temporomandibular disorders (M‐TMD) commonly involve occlusal splint (OS) therapy and musculoskeletal physiotherapy (MPT).ObjectivesTo compare the effects of combining OS with MPT and education (EG) against OS and education (CG), in chronic M‐TMD patients.MethodsIn this double‐blind randomised controlled trial, 62 participants were assigned to either EG or CG. The primary outcomes, pain levels at rest (VAS rest), maximum oral opening (VAS open) and during chewing (VAS chew), were measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in cm. The secondary outcome was the range of motion (ROM) for maximum oral opening. Both interventions lasted 3 months, with outcomes assessed at baseline (T0), post‐treatment (T1) and 3 months post‐treatment (T2).ResultsIntention‐to‐treat analysis revealed significant improvements favouring EG (VAS rest = −1.50 cm [CI95%: −2.67, −0.32], p = .04; VAS open = −2.00 cm [CI95%: −3.23, −0.75], p < .01; VAS chew = −1.71 cm [CI95%: −2.90, −0.52], p = .01; ROM = 4.61 [CI95%: 0.93, 8.30], p = .04). Additionally, VAS measures were influenced by follow‐up times (VAS rest = −0.73 cm [CI95%: −1.30, −0.17], p = 0.03; VAS open = −0.97 cm [CI95%: −1.57, −0.37], p < .01; VAS chew = −1.15 cm [CI95%: −1.73, −0.58], p < .01). At T1, EG demonstrated higher number of responders compared to CG for VAS open (χ2(1) = 4.39, p = .04) and VAS chew (χ2(1) = 11.58, p < .01).ConclusionAdding MPT to education and OS yields better outcomes in terms of pain reduction and ROM improvement, in chronic M‐TMD.Trial Registration NumberNCT03726060.