The dose response of erythemal area and intensity on the unprotected skin fits well to a logistic 3P model in SPF tests of a Chinese population, which has the potential to improve the precision and consistency of minimal erythema dose determination
-
Published:2023-09-04
Issue:6
Volume:39
Page:633-641
-
ISSN:0905-4383
-
Container-title:Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Photoderm Photoimm Photomed
Author:
Qu Di1ORCID,
Liao Feng2,
Liu Jianwei2,
Li Xiangzi3,
Ye Congxiu3,
Zheng Yue3,
Xie Xiaoyuan3,
Yi Jinling3,
Lai Wei3
Affiliation:
1. Amway Innovation & Science Ada Michigan USA
2. Amway (Shanghai) Innovation & Science Center Shanghai China
3. Department of Dermatology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou China
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe current ISO guidelines for minimal erythema dose (MED) determination require assessment of erythema area of UV‐irradiated skin sites. However, this parameter has not been adequately quantified in daily practice. The aims of this study were to investigate the dose response on the unprotected skin sites by quantifying the erythema area and intensity and to show the potential for improving the precision and consistency of MEDu determination by developing predictive models.MethodsStandard radiation tests were conducted on the back of 31 healthy Chinese volunteers and the MEDu site of each subject was clinically determined by dermatologists. Images of test sites were captured 24 h after radiation, and the erythema area (%EA) and intensity (∆a*) were measured by image analysis. The data were fitted to a logistic 3P function to obtain dose–response curves, and a set of logit (inverse‐logistic) models were then derived. An erythema area threshold of %EA = 52% was established to predict MEDu based on the clinical endpoints defined by ISO 24444:2019.ResultsAnalysis of the clinically determined MEDu sites revealed wide ranges of %EA (62.3 ± 15% SD) and ∆a* (2.96 ± 0.92 SD). The dose response fitted well to a logistic 3P model (mean R2 = 0.965 and 0.975 for %EA and ∆a*, respectively). Applying the area threshold, values of MEDu were determined by the logit model for the test population, which significantly improved the consistency of MEDu determination (52 ± 0% SD and 2.73 ± 0.61 SD for %EA and ∆a*, respectively).ConclusionThis study demonstrated that the dose response of UV‐induced erythema can be quantified and modeled once the erythema area and intensity are measured. The results of this study show the potential to improve the precision and consistency of MEDu determination in an SPF test. The similar potential in photodermatological, therapeutic, and diagnostic applications was also implied.
Subject
Dermatology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Immunology,General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy
Reference37 articles.
1. US Food and Drug Administration.CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Part 352 Sunscreen Drug Products for Over‐the‐Counter Human Use.2022.https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title‐21/chapter‐I/subchapter‐D/part‐352 Accessed June 13 2023.
2. The International Organization for Standardization Cosmetics – Sun protection test methods – In vivo determination of the sun protection factor (SPF) ISO 24444:2019(en).2019.https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:24444:ed‐2:v1:en. Accessed June 13 2023.
3. Sun protection factor measurement of sunscreens is dependent on minimal erythema dose
4. Evaluation of the antioxidant capacity and protective effects of a comprehensive topical antioxidant containing water‐soluble, enzymatic, and lipid‐soluble antioxidants;McDaniel D;J Clin Aesthet Dermatol,2019