Affiliation:
1. Biomedical Group (BIO277) Department of Nursing Faculty of Health Sciences University of Granada Granada Spain
2. Institute of Biosanitary Research (IbsGranada) Granada Spain
3. Institute of Neuroscience University of Granada Centro de Investigación Biomédica (CIBM) Parque de Tecnológico de La Salud (PTS) Granada Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Antiseptics are used for the cleansing of acute or chronic wounds to eliminate micro-organisms from the wound bed. However, they have effects on the skin cells.
Aim
To determine the effects of hexetidine, povidone–iodine (PI), undecylenamidopropyl-betaine/polyhexanide (UBP), chlorhexidine, disodium eosin and hydrogen peroxide on human skin fibroblasts.
Methods
CCD-1064Sk cells were treated with hexetidine, PI, UBP, chlorhexidine, disodium eosin or hydrogen peroxide. Spectrophotometry was used to measure cell viability and flow cytometry was used to study apoptosis and necrosis after the treatment. In vitro wound scratch assays were performed to determine the gap closure.
Results
All antiseptics significantly reduced the viability of human skin fibroblasts compared with controls. The percentage wound closure was lower with hexetidine, PI and UBP. The scratch assay could not be measured after treatments with chlorhexidine, disodium eosin or hydrogen peroxide, owing to their cytotoxicity. The apoptosis/necrosis experiments evidenced a significant reduction in viable cells compared with controls. An increased percentage of apoptotic cells was observed after treatment with all antiseptics. Compared with controls, the percentage of necrotic cells was significantly increased with all antiseptics except for hexetidine.
Conclusion
The proliferation, migration and viability of human skin fibroblasts are reduced by treatment with hexetidine, PI, UBP, chlorhexidine, disodium eosin and hydrogen peroxide.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference25 articles.
1. The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: a systematic review;Olsson;Wound Repair Regen,2019
2. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing;Martin;Br J Dermatol,2015
3. Recent advances in non-conventional antimicrobial approaches for chronic wound biofilms: have we found the ‘chink in the armor’?;Kadam;Biomedicines,2019
4. The downside of antimicrobial agents for wound healing;Punjataewakupt;Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis,2019
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献