Affiliation:
1. Swansea University Swansea UK
Abstract
ABSTRACTShould political leaders have a right to privacy? Incursions by new and traditional media into the private lives of political leaders are commonplace. Are such incursions ethically justifiable?Prima facie, the question of ‘political privacy’ seems to involve a conflict between a politician's self‐interest in retaining a protected private realm and citizens' public interest in having access to information about their representative's private life. Indeed, this is the structure that the debate has typically assumed. I challenge this orthodox view by demonstrating that there is a public interest in political privacy grounded in the relationship between privacy and political judgement. I argue that the political privacy debate should be recast to recognise this conflict between two different strands of the public interest. This conflict presents a dilemma for democratic theory: in providing voters with private information relevant to the evaluation of political leaders' suitability for office and performance within it, we threaten to undermine the conditions necessary to attract candidates of judgement and for political leaders to judge well once in office.
Reference50 articles.
1. Jacinda Ardern Becomes Youngest New Zealand Labour Leader After Andrew Little Quits;Eleanor Ainge Roy;The Guardian,2017
2. Unpopular PrivacyWhat Must We Hide?
3. A Life-Changing Event: First Births and Men's and Women's Attitudes to Mothering and Gender Divisions of Labor
4. BBC News.“Cameron May Face More Questions.”February 11 2007.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6352273.stm.
5. BBC News.“Melania Trump Has a Transactional Marriage Says Former Aide.”September 11 2020.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-54112954.