Affiliation:
1. Philosophy Department University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USA
Abstract
ABSTRACTAs a growing number of embryos collect in fertility clinics, it is imperative to evaluate the permissibility of available options for genetic parents and fertility institutions. Much of the discussion on appropriate treatment of embryos has focused on the circumstances under which it is permissible to destroy embryos for instrumental purposes, and thus has little application to the fertility context. I aim to develop a new account of the value of embryos whereby embryos have final value in virtue of their relationship to persons that could exist. I call this symbolic value. To establish this value, I first show that corpses have this same symbolic value in virtue of their relationship to prior persons, and then show that the cases of corpses and embryos are relevantly similar. Because of this value, we ought to treat embryos in particular respectful ways. It is currently common practice in the United States to simply discard extra embryos that exist as a result of in vitro fertilization. I argue it is generally impermissible to simply discard embryos because it is an act of disrespect and does not treat them in accordance with their value.
Reference43 articles.
1. Final destination of surplus cryopreserved embryos. What decision should be made?
2. Calderone Julia.“10 Years of Fertility Advances: How a Decade of Major Discoveries Has Dramatically Changed How We Think about Conception.”New York Times April 19 2020.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/19/parenting/fertility/fertility-advances.html.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Assisted Reproductive Technology: Fertility Clinic Success Rates ReportAtlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services 2018.
4. Destroying unwanted embryos in research