Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Languages and Cultures Kyushu University Kyushu Japan
Abstract
ABSTRACTGlobal threats to academic freedom are multiplying not only in an era of authoritarian resurgence, but also – less overtly – in an era of increasingly managerial governance of higher‐education sectors in democratic nations, where protection of institutional revenue streams, and of institutional reputation, may take priority over protection of scholars' and students' academic freedoms. In such circumstances, justifications for rendering aid to at‐risk scholars and students have become obscured. This article argues that the Kantian concept of imperfect duty can be adapted to theorizing collective, institutional obligations to aid those scholars and students, undertaken in light of academic freedom as a constitutive institutional value.
Reference18 articles.
1. American Association of University Professors.“1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure.”1940.https://www.aaup.org/report/1940-statement-principles-academic-freedom-and-tenure.
2. The Supererogatory and Kant’s Imperfect Duties
3. Cai Jiquan.“Prisoner Profile: Tohti Tunyaz.”Human Rights in China. February 17 2003.https://www.hrichina.org/en/content/4563.
4. The Moral Habitat
5. Perfect and Imperfect Duties to Aid;Igneski Violetta;Social Theory and Practice