Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractThis article updates estimates of which presidents won more or fewer votes than should be expected through President Biden's first two years in office. Multiple regression models estimating the effects of contextual variables (party, public approval, and party polarization plus interactions) establish a common baseline. Errors reveal which presidents won more or less than should be expected. Party polarization conditions relationships between party control and presidential success, but effects differ across chambers. As polarization increases in the House, majority presidents win more votes and minority presidents win fewer. The effects are less obvious in the Senate. Majority presidents win more than do minority presidents regardless of polarization. But polarization has led to a de facto 60‐vote Senate, as the minority party uses the supermajority required to invoke cloture to block confirmation of presidential appointments. Conclusions discuss limitations of roll‐call vote measures of presidential success.
Reference35 articles.
1. Why Parties?
2. Validity and Reliability of Identifying Presidential Positions on Roll-Call Votes in the Age of Trump
3. Contemporary Presidency
: Which Presidents Are Uncommonly Successful in Congress? A Trump Update
4. Bond Jon R. andJeffrey E.Cohen.2015. "Polarized Public Opinion and Presidential Success in Congress." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association San Francisco CA.