Risk prediction models in emergency surgery: Protocol for a scoping review

Author:

Hansted Anna K.1,Møller Morten H.23,Møller Ann M.13,Burcharth Jakob345,Thorup Sofie S.1,Vester‐Andersen Morten13

Affiliation:

1. Herlev Anaesthesia Critical and Emergency Care Science Unit (ACES), Department of Anaesthesiology Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev Hospital Herlev Denmark

2. Department of Intensive Care 4131 Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark

5. Emergency Surgery Research Group Copenhagen (EMERGE Cph) Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRisk prediction models are used for many purposes in emergency surgery, including critical care triage and benchmarking. Several risk prediction models have been developed, and some are used for purposes other than those for which they were developed. We aim to provide an overview of the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps.MethodsWe will conduct a scoping review on risk prediction models used for patients undergoing emergency surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). We will search Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and include all study designs. We aim to answer the following questions: (1) What risk prediction models are used in emergency surgery? (2) Which variables are used in these models? (3) Which surgical specialties are the models used for? (4) Have the models been externally validated? (5) Where have the models been externally validated? (6) What purposes were the models developed for? (7) What are the strengths and limitations of the included models? We will summarize the results descriptively. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.ConclusionThe outlined scoping review will summarize the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3