Affiliation:
1. School of Built Environment University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
2. College of Business and Law Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Australia
3. Faculty of Law and Justice University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
Abstract
AbstractThis paper challenges current approaches to undertaking community‐centred disaster recovery. Community‐centred approaches are widely recognised as ‘the gold standard’ for effective recovery from disasters. Yet, they are rarely applied well enough in practice. Challenges include the ‘authority’ culture of command‐and‐control agencies, the emphasis on discrete recovery time frames, and the reluctance to relinquish centralised control. The paper focuses on people's experiences of community‐centred recovery in New South Wales, Australia, which has experienced severe fires and floods since 2019. We undertook key informant interviews and an online survey to inquire into how community‐centred recovery is enacted. Our work uncovered widespread dissatisfaction with current practices. The paper discusses key themes emerging from the research and ends with a call to change how community‐centred recovery is framed and conducted by responding organisations, to include the underlying causes of vulnerability in recovery, to measure success differently, and to alter the narrative of who ‘owns’ disasters.
Reference46 articles.
1. Decision making in disaster management cycle of natural disasters: a review;Arifah A.R.;International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences.,2019
2. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
3. Asian Disaster Reduction Center(2005)Total Disaster Risk Management: Good Practices.https://www.adrc.asia/publications/TDRM2005/TDRM_Good_Practices/GP2005_e.html(last accessed on 6 August 2024).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献