Challenges in humanitarian response implementation: a large‐scale review of aid worker perspectives

Author:

Bollettino Vincenzo1ORCID,Isely Rachel2,Nyarko Godfred3,Rudnicki Chloe4,Rehmani Karima5,Stoddard Hannah6,Vinck Patrick7

Affiliation:

1. Senior Research Scientist at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University United States

2. Humanitarian Programs Director at Concern Worldwide US United States

3. Research Program Manager at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University United States

4. Research Assistant at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University United States

5. Program Manager | Humanitarian Academy at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University United States

6. Program Manager | Program on Resilient Communities at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University United States

7. Research Director at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University United States

Abstract

Aid workers offer important perspectives for understanding better the most pervasive challenges that arise when implementing emergency response programming in humanitarian settings. This large sample study provides a global review of these perspectives, derived from 4,679 applications to the National NGO Program on Humanitarian Leadership, in which aid workers were asked to respond to the following question: ‘What do you consider to be the biggest challenges in the implementation of emergency response programming in today's humanitarian settings?’. Through a qualitative coding process, the research team identified 14 major challenges that were prevalent across the applicants’ responses and cross‐tabulated these with their demographics. Coordination (30 per cent) and operating environment (29.5 per cent) were the most frequently reported. The study found a significant association between challenges identified and certain demographic variables. The results supplement a body of literature that is largely composed of small‐scale, context‐specific studies in which disaggre‐gation of data by demographics is not possible.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Social Sciences

Reference31 articles.

1. Aid Worker Security Database(2023) ‘Highest incident contexts (1997–2022)’. Website.https://aidworker-security.org/incidents/report/contexts(last accessed on 6 September 2023).

2. Localisation Across the Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus

3. Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: a systematic review

4. The Localization of Aid in Jordan and Lebanon: Barriers and Opportunities for Women-Led Organizations;Bruschini-Chaumet C.;Development Management Consultancy Project,2019

5. A fuzzy multi-criteria approach based on Clarke and Wright savings algorithm for vehicle routing problem in humanitarian aid distribution;Cengiz Toklu M.;Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3