Universities in a contested space: The dominance of calculative accounting practices and the development of a research agenda

Author:

Hyndman Noel1,Lapsley Irvine2ORCID,Liguori Mariannunziata3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Queen's University Business School Queens University Belfast Belfast Northern Ireland

2. IPSAR, University of Edinburgh Business School University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

3. Durham Business School Durham University Durham UK

Abstract

AbstractOver the last few decades, neoliberal, managerial, reforms have dominated the university sector in a number of different countries. Calculative practices, including performance measures and indicators, have spread and targets, in terms of research outputs and increasing student numbers in order to generate “profit”, have become the norm, despite the many voices seeing this as often clashing with the mission of universities to create knowledge and contribute to social development. The paper provides an overview of the changing focus on how universities have been managed over time and, at the same time, of the emergence and measurementof Public Value themes in the university sector. A future research agenda is proposed for those interested in the study of the university sector, together with possibleresearch questions to further this area.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference93 articles.

1. The System of Professions

2. English universities over‐reliant on overseas students’ fees, report warns;Adams R.;The Guardian,2022

3. Management as ideology: New managerialism and the corporate university in the age of COVID‐19;Al Mahameed M.;Financial Accountability & Management,2024

4. Anderson R.(2010 March 1).‘The ‘Idea of a University’ today’.History & Policy: Policy Papers. Retrieved fromhttps://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy‐papers/papers/the‐idea‐of‐a‐university‐today

5. WHAT’S MEASURED IS WHAT MATTERS: TARGETS AND GAMING IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3