The effectiveness of parenteral agents for pain reduction in patients with migraine presenting to emergency settings: A systematic review and network analysis

Author:

Kirkland Scott W.1ORCID,Visser Lloyd1,Meyer Jillian1,Junqueira Daniela R.2,Campbell Sandra3,Villa‐Roel Cristina1,Friedman Benjamin W.4ORCID,Essel Nana Owusu1,Rowe Brian H.15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

2. Evidera Edmonton Alberta Canada

3. Health Sciences Library University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York New York USA

5. School of Public Health College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of parenteral agents for pain reduction in patients with acute migraine.BackgroundParenteral agents have been shown to be effective in treating acute migraine pain; however, the comparative effectiveness of different approaches is unclear.MethodsNine electronic databases and gray literature sources were searched to identify randomized clinical trials assessing parenteral agents to treat acute migraine pain in emergency settings. Two independent reviewers completed study screening, data extraction, and Cochrane risk‐of‐bias assessment, with differences being resolved by adjudication. The protocol of the review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42018100096).ResultsA total of 97 unique studies were included, with most studies reporting a high or unclear risk of bias. Monotherapy, as well as combination therapy, successfully reduced pain scores prior to discharge. They also increased the proportion of patients reporting pain relief and being pain free. Across the pain outcomes assessed, combination therapy was one of the higher ranked approaches and provided robust improvements in pain outcomes, including lowering pain scores (mean difference −3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] −4.64 to −2.08) and increasing the proportion of patients reporting pain relief (risk ratio [RR] 2.83, 95% CI 1.74–4.61). Neuroleptics and metoclopramide also ranked high in terms of the proportion of patients reporting pain relief (neuroleptics RR 2.76, 95% CI 2.12–3.60; metoclopramide RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.90–3.49) and being pain free before emergency department discharge (neuroleptics RR 4.8, 95% CI 3.61–6.49; metoclopramide RR 4.1, 95% CI 3.02–5.44). Most parenteral agents were associated with increased adverse events, particularly combination therapy and neuroleptics.ConclusionsVarious parenteral agents were found to provide effective pain relief. Considering the consistent improvements across various outcomes, combination therapy, as well as monotherapy of either metoclopramide or neuroleptics are recommended as first‐line options for managing acute migraine pain. There are risks of adverse events, especially akathisia, following treatment with these agents. We recommend that a shared decision‐making model be considered to effectively identify the best treatment option based on the patient's needs.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3