Massive transfusion protocol reactivation as a novel marker of physician team under‐triage after injury

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLarge trauma centers have protocols for the assessment of injury and triaging of care with attempts to over‐triage to ensure adequate care for all patients. We noted that a significant number of patients undergo a second massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation in the first 24 h of care and conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients involved over a 3‐year period.MethodsTransfusion service records of MTP activations 2019–2021 were linked to Trauma Registry records and divided into cohorts receiving a single versus a reactivation of the MTP. Time of activation and amounts of blood products issued were linked to demographic, injury severity, and outcome data. Categorical and continuous data were compared between cohorts with chi‐squared, Fisher's, and Wilcoxan tests as appropriate, and multivariable regression models were used to seek interactions (p < .05).ResultsMTP activation was recorded for 1884 acute trauma patients over our 3‐year study period, 142 of whom (7.5%) had reactivation. Factors associated with reactivation included older age (46 vs. 40 years), higher injury severity score (ISS, 27 vs. 22), leg injuries, and presentation during morning shift change (5–7 a.m., 3.3% vs. 7.7%). Patients undergoing MTP reactivation used more RBCs (5 U vs. 2 U) and had more ICU days (3 vs. 2).ConclusionsOlder patients and those presenting during shift change are at risk for failure to recognize their complex injury patterns and under‐triage for trauma care. The fidelity and granularity of transfusion service records can provide unique opportunities for quality assessment and improvement in trauma care.