Development and validation of machine learning models to predict frailty risk for elderly

Author:

Zhang Wei1ORCID,Wang Junchao2ORCID,Xie Fang3,Wang Xinghui4,Dong Shanshan5,Luo Nan6,Li Feng4ORCID,Li Yuewei4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University Kunming China

2. China‐Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun China

3. Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou China

4. School of Nursing Jilin University Changchun China

5. Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department, General External Center First Hospital of Jilin University Changchun China

6. The Second Hospital of Jilin University Changchun China

Abstract

AbstractAimsEarly identification and intervention of the frailty of the elderly will help lighten the burden of social medical care and improve the quality of life of the elderly. Therefore, we used machine learning (ML) algorithm to develop models to predict frailty risk in the elderly.DesignA prospective cohort study.MethodsWe collected data on 6997 elderly people from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study wave 6–7 surveys (2011–2012, 2014). After the baseline survey in 1998 (wave 1), the project conducted follow‐up surveys (wave 2–8) in 2000–2018. The osteoporotic fractures index was used to assess frailty. Four ML algorithms (random forest [RF], support vector machine, XGBoost and logistic regression [LR]) were used to develop models to identify the risk factors of frailty and predict the risk of frailty. Different ML models were used for the prediction of frailty risk in the elderly and frailty risk was trained on a cohort of 4385 elderly people with frailty (split into a training cohort [75%] and internal validation cohort [25%]). The best‐performing model for each study outcome was tested in an external validation cohort of 6997 elderly people with frailty pooled from the surveys (wave 6–7). Model performance was assessed by receiver operating curve and F2‐score.ResultsAmong the four ML models, the F2‐score values were similar (0.91 vs. 0.91 vs. 0.88 vs. 0.90), and the area under the curve (AUC) values of RF model was the highest (0.75), followed by LR model (0.74). In the final two models, the AUC values of RF and LR model were similar (0.77 vs. 0.76) and their accuracy was identical (87.4% vs. 87.4%).ConclusionOur study developed a preliminary prediction model based on two different ML approaches to help predict frailty risk in the elderly.ImpactThe presented models from this study can be used to inform healthcare providers to predict the frailty probability among older adults and maybe help guide the development of effective frailty risk management interventions.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareDetecting frailty at an early stage and implementing timely targeted interventions may help to improve the allocation of health care resources and to reduce frailty‐related burden. Identifying risk factors for frailty could be beneficial to provide tailored and personalized care intervention for older adults to more accurately prevent or improve their frail conditions so as to improve their quality of life.Reporting MethodThe study has adhered to STROBE guidelines.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3