Anaerobic adhesives effect on counter‐torque of abutment screws on implants with external hexagon and conical connections: An in vitro study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAbutment screw loosening is a common complication of implant supported prostheses, especially for single crowns. In engineering, anaerobic adhesives (AA) are used to provide chemical locking between screw surfaces, but their application in implantology remains unclear.PurposeThe purpose of this article is to evaluate, in vitro, the effect of AA on counter‐torque of abutment screws for cemented prosthesis on dental implants with external hexagon connection (EHC) and conical connection (CC).Materials and methodsSample was composed by 60 specimens, 30 dental implants with EHC and 30 with CC. Abutments (transmucosal 3 mm straight universal abutment) were installed without AA (control group) or with application of AA with two different adhesive strength: medium strength (LOCTITE® 242) and high strength (LOCTITE® 277). The specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling at 37°C, with a load setting of 133 N, a 1.3 Hz frequency, and 1 200 000 cycles. The abutments were removed, and the counter‐torque values were registered. Screws and implants were inspected using a stereomicroscope to verify the presence of residual adhesive and damage the internal structures. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparison tests (p < 0.05).ResultsComparing to the torque of installation, the medium strength AA kept the counter‐torque values for CC implants and the high strength AA kept the counter‐torque for EHC implants and increased for CC implants. In the intergroup comparisons, control group presented significantly lower counter‐torque values than other groups, both for EHC and CC implants. High strength AA presented similar results to medium strength AA in the EHC implants, but in the CC implants presented higher counter‐torque values. Damage in threads was more frequent in the groups that received high strength AA.ConclusionThe use of AA increased the counter‐torque of abutment screws, both in implants with EHC and CC.