Observing, ‘doing’ and ‘making’ gender in Dutch paediatric type 1 diabetes care, at home and in the clinic: Multiple‐stakeholder perspectives

Author:

Liu Yosheng1ORCID,Verdonk Petra1,de Wit Maartje23,Nefs Giesje456ORCID,Dedding Christine1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Department of Medical Psychology Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Department of Medical Psychology Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Nijmegen The Netherlands

5. Diabeter, Center for Type 1 Diabetes Care and Research Rotterdam The Netherlands

6. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS—Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAimTo investigate the perspectives of Dutch care professionals, parents and experts by experience on gender dynamics in paediatric type 1 diabetes care.DesignQualitative research design.MethodsFifteen semi‐structured interviews were held with care professionals, supplemented by two focus groups with parents of children with diabetes (n = 12 parents) and three semi‐structured interviews with two experts by experience and a mother. Two respondent validation interviews were conducted, one with two care professionals and one with an expert by experience. Participant observations were conducted at three clinics, a diabetes sports day, weekend for young people and their families, and a high‐school. An inductive framework analysis was done, informed by relational theory on gender.ResultsCare professionals ‘did’ and ‘made’ gender differences together with young people, manifesting as communicative difficulties, in particular between female care professionals and young boys. Boys were considered less skilled in articulating their needs compared to girls. At home, care professionals and parents observed, ‘did’ and ‘made’ gender differences by perpetuating gendered divisions of labour. As traditional caretakers, mothers risk focusing excessively on the diabetes of their child whilst fathers remained more at a distance.ConclusionGender patterns have negative implications on those involved in paediatric type 1 diabetes. Leaving tacit the gendered communicative issues across child–parent and child‐care professional dyads, can sustain invisible friction in a care system that normatively expects verbal participation and increased self‐management.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareFindings may encourage care professionals and parents to engage with the potential impact of gender dynamics on diabetes practices. Incorporating these dynamics as conversational tools would contribute to improving type 1 diabetes care for young people.

Funder

Diabetes Fonds

ZonMw

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3