‘That was all over the shop’: Exploring the COVID‐19 response in disability residential settings

Author:

McAllister Ashley1ORCID,Dickinson Helen2ORCID,Huska Marie1,Devine Alexandra1,Dimov Stefanie1,Kavanagh Anne1

Affiliation:

1. School of Population and Global Health The University of Melbourne Carlton Victoria Australia

2. Public Service Research Group The University of New South Wales Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

Abstract

AbstractPeople with disability are an ‘at‐risk’ group in a pandemic context for various clinical and structural reasons. However, in the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic, people with disability were not identified as a priority group, which exacerbated this risk, particularly for those living in congregate settings. This paper examines inter‐organisational issues during the second wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic in disability residential settings gathered from senior managers, team leaders, and disability support workers. We use Victoria as a case study since several Victorian disability residential settings were in mid‐transition from state provision to non‐profit organisations. We argue that residential settings in mid‐transition had clearer lines of organisational accountability and communication, which was thought to reduce the impact of outbreaks compared to residential settings in other States and Territories with multiple lines of communication and blurred accountability. The paper contributes to the literature on inter‐organisational collaboration by reinforcing the necessity of clear lines of accountability and leadership in collaborative governance during emergencies. The evidence suggests how government and disability residential settings could better support residents and staff in future COVID‐19 outbreaks or other pandemics.Points for practitioners People with disability, particularly those living in congregate settings, are often at heightened risk during public health emergencies. Clearer lines of responsibility, administrative, and communication arrangements across organisations and governments, alongside tailored responses within residential settings, are required to keep ‘at‐risk’ individuals safe. Emergency management block funding could be designed to alleviate the financial pressures identified in this study for residential disability services in future pandemic responses.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference42 articles.

1. Abel C. &Lai J.(2020 Oct 7).Disabled Canadians ignored in policies on COVID‐19. Policy Options Politques.policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/october‐2020/disabled‐canadians‐ignored‐in‐policies‐on‐covid‐19/

2. The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews

3. Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review

4. Barriers to the Integration of Care in Inter-Organisational Settings: A Literature Review

5. Australian Department of Health. (2020).Communications Strategy for people with disability: NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (COVID‐19).https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/10/management‐and‐operational‐plan‐for‐people‐with‐disability‐appendix‐b‐communications‐strategy‐for‐people‐with‐disability.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3