Public servants working from home during the pandemic: Who gained and who lost?

Author:

Williamson Sue1,Colley Linda2ORCID,Huybers Twan1,Tani Massimiliano1

Affiliation:

1. School of Business UNSW Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

2. Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations, School of Business and Law CQUniversity, Brisbane Rockhampton Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractEmployees experienced both advantages and disadvantages while working from home during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Researchers have examined these impacts on women and those with caring responsibilities; however, little research has examined the impacts on other groups of employees, such as those with a disability or employed on a casual basis. In this article, we focus on the public sector and examine who gained and who lost while working from home, based on a 2020 survey of over 5000 Australian public servants. We have constructed loss and gain indices to measure three elements of a change model, which enables an evaluation of the impacts on various groups of employees. The elements of change management examined are operational areas, performance management, and beliefs and values. To analyse the factors affecting gains and losses, as summarised in the indices, we applied a statistical model estimated using linear regression methods. Our findings reveal that, on average, survey participants experienced a net gain. Families and employees with a disability gained; however, women gained less than men in the first two categories and gained more than men on the beliefs and values category. These findings highlight areas on which public service organisations need to focus as we enter a COVID‐normal era.Points for practitioners The benefits and drawbacks of working from home differ according to employee demographics. Overall, lower level employees and those employed on a casual basis gained less than higher level employees and those employed full time. Women gained less than men in relation to how work was operationalised and performed. These differential impacts highlight areas on which public sector organisations need to focus in a COVID‐normal era.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference68 articles.

1. How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings

2. Australian Public Service Commission (APSC). (2022).Diversity and inclusion report.Commonwealth of Australia.

3. Australian Public Service Commission (APSC). (2021).State of the service report: Reform in the shadow of COVID.Commonwealth of Australia.

4. Organizations Don’t Resist Change, People Do: Modeling Individual Reactions to Organizational Change Through Loss and Terror Management

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3