Knowledge brokering for public sector reform

Author:

Cuffe Honae1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australia and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG) Carlton Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractBetter use of evidence is at the centre of the ambitious Australian Public Sector Reform agenda, providing an authorising environment in which to test new ideas, tools, and approaches to bridge the research–practice gap. As the interlocutors between research and practice, knowledge brokers have a critical role to play in promoting the structural and behavioural changes necessary to build the knowledge networks and new capabilities that enable an evidence ecosystem. In particular, this article makes a case for harnessing the relational nature of knowledge brokering and trialling new mechanisms for research–practitioner collaboration and evidence innovation. It is hoped that this article can serve as the foundation for a future research and practice agenda examining how knowledge brokering operates and where university‐produced research can best support evidence‐based reform.Points for practitioners As the interlocutors between research and practice, knowledge brokers can encourage the cross‐boundary thinking, genuine partnerships, and new capabilities to support evidence‐based reform. The Australian Public Sector Reform agenda provides a unique opportunity to trial new mechanisms and approaches to expand understanding of how knowledge brokering operates in practice and the conditions that support successful research–practice collaboration. Mechanisms should be formal and accompanied by bureaucratic‐level support and incentives, providing them with the legitimacy needed to embed new mindsets, capabilities, and ways of working. A key consideration for public sector practitioners is how to establish arrangements and incentives that are mutually beneficial for researchers and practitioners alike and monitor the effectiveness of these initiatives over time.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference11 articles.

1. APS Reform. (2023).APS reform outcomes and initiatives.https://www.apsreform.gov.au/about‐aps‐reform/our‐focus‐areas

2. Abdo M. Goh E. Hateley‐Browne J. Wong J. Bajaj A. &Mildon R.(2021).What works for “what works” centres: Learnings from system‐level efforts to cultivate evidence informed practice.Centre for Evidence and Implementation.https://www.edresearch.edu.au/sites/default/files/2022‐02/what‐works‐for‐what‐works‐centres‐cei‐report.pdf

3. Ball S.(2024).Australian Public Service‐Academia Collaboration Workshop 2023 Outcomes report.Commonwealth of Australia.https://www.apsreform.gov.au/research/academia‐collaboration‐workshop‐2023‐outcomes‐report

4. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. (2019).Our public service our future: Independent review of the Australian Public Service.Commonwealth of Australia.https://www.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/resource/download/independent‐review‐aps.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3