Exploring the limits of collaboration and the fragility of its outcomes: The case of community policing

Author:

Headley Andrea M.1ORCID,Kalesnikaite Vaiva2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. McCourt School of Public Policy Georgetown University Washington DC USA

2. Department of Political Science Clemson University Clemson SC USA

Abstract

AbstractUnderstanding collaboration between the government and community leaders or organizations is essential for effectively delivering services and creating public value. Interorganizational collaboration is particularly salient in communities of color when considering how historic exclusions of marginalized voices have inhibited equity. This study draws upon 88 in‐depth, semistructured interviews on collaboration (and its limits) between the police and community in Hartford, Connecticut, US. Using this context, the findings highlight the limits of collaborative community policing with regard to resources, reach, expectations, implementation, and power balances. Moreover, even after overcoming challenges, the translation of collaborative actions (e.g., community policing) into social outcomes (e.g., police–community relations) is fragile. For instance, leadership or critical incidents can influence whether community policing activities actually lead to gains in police–community relations. Taken as a whole, this study demonstrates how collaboration unfolds with community organizations, how it impacts police–community relations in communities of color, and the limitations thereof.

Funder

Bureau of Justice Statistics

Publisher

Wiley

Reference71 articles.

1. Abramson Jerry.2015.“Cities Making Real Progress Since the Launch of the 21st Century Policing Task Force.”May 18 2015.https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/05/18/10-cities-making-real-progress-launch-21st-century-policing-task-force

2. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice;Ansell Chris;Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008

3. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology;Braun Virginia;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

4. The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research;Brooks Joanna;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3