Molecular profiling of gingival crevicular fluid fails to distinguish between infrabony and suprabony periodontal defects

Abstract

AbstractAimTo assess the differential molecular profiling of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) from infrabony and suprabony periodontal defects compared with healthy sites.Materials and MethodsSeventy‐five samples from 25 patients with untreated periodontitis stage III–IV were included. Clinical and radiological parameters as well as GCF samples were collected from an infrabony defect, a suprabony defect and a periodontally healthy site per patient. A multiplex bead immunoassay was performed to assess the level of 18 biomarkers associated with inflammation, connective tissue degradation and regeneration/repair.ResultsGCF volume was higher in periodontal sites compared with healthy sites, with no significant difference between infrabony and suprabony defects. Fourteen biomarkers were elevated in infrabony and suprabony sites compared with healthy sites (p < .05). Only interleukin‐1α levels were increased in infrabony compared with suprabony sites, whereas there was no difference in probing pocket depth.ConclusionsAlthough the GCF molecular profile clearly differentiates periodontally affected sites from healthy sites, the different architecture between infrabony and suprabony defects is not reflected in GCF biomarker changes.