Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery New York University Langone Health New York New York USA
2. Department of Surgery Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein Utrecht The Netherlands
3. Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
4. Department of Surgery Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
5. Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
6. Division of Imaging and Oncology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
7. Department of Surgery Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore Maryland USA
8. Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal
Abstract
AbstractBackground and AimIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)‐derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) management is generally extrapolated from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)‐derived PDAC guidelines. However, these are biologically divergent, and heterogeneity further exists between tubular and colloid subtypes.MethodsConsecutive upfront surgery patients with PanIN‐derived and IPMN‐derived PDAC were retrospectively identified from international centers (2000–2019). One‐to‐one propensity score matching for clinicopathologic factors generated three cohorts: IPMN‐derived versus PanIN‐derived PDAC, tubular IPMN‐derived versus PanIN‐derived PDAC, and tubular versus colloid IPMN‐derived PDAC. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan–Meier and log‐rank tests. Multivariable Cox regression determined corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).ResultsThe median OS (mOS) in 2350 PanIN‐derived and 700 IPMN‐derived PDAC patients was 23.0 and 43.1 months (P < 0.001), respectively. PanIN‐derived PDAC had worse T‐stage, CA19‐9, grade, and nodal status. Tubular subtype had worse T‐stage, CA19‐9, grade, nodal status, and R1 margins, with a mOS of 33.7 versus 94.1 months (P < 0.001) in colloid. Matched (n = 495), PanIN‐derived and IPMN‐derived PDAC had mOSs of 30.6 and 42.8 months (P < 0.001), respectively. In matched (n = 341) PanIN‐derived and tubular IPMN‐derived PDAC, mOS remained poorer (27.7 vs 37.4, P < 0.001). Matched tubular and colloid cancers (n = 112) had similar OS (P = 0.55). On multivariable Cox regression, PanIN‐derived PDAC was associated with worse OS than IPMN‐derived (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.44–1.90) and tubular IPMN‐derived (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.32–1.77) PDAC. Colloid and tubular subtype was not associated with OS (P = 0.16).ConclusionsPanIN‐derived PDAC has worse survival than IPMN‐derived PDAC supporting distinct outcomes. Although more indolent, colloid IPMN‐derived PDAC has similar survival to tubular after risk adjustment.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献