Association between divisional location and short‐term outcome of liver mass resection in 124 dogs

Author:

Moore Vaughan W.1,White Joanna1,Marchevsky Andrew Malcolm1

Affiliation:

1. Small Animal Specialist Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the association between divisional location of liver masses on short‐term outcomes after surgical excision.Study designRetrospective case series.AnimalsClient‐owned dogs (n = 124).MethodsRecords were reviewed for demographics, surgical findings, and outcomes. The associations between mass location and mortality, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications were tested with multivariable logistic regression models.ResultsLiver masses (124) were more common in the left (72) division than the central (34) and right (18) divisions. Median follow up was 286 (range: 14 to 2043) days. Intraoperative complications occurred in 14/124 dogs (11.3%) and postoperative complications in 35/122 dogs (28.7%). No association was detected between mass location and mortality in 8/124 dogs (6.5%). Postoperative complications were more likely if the incision extended to the thorax (P < .001), which was more common during resection of right divisional masses (P = .020). Postoperative complications were less likely when surgery was performed with a thoracoabdominal (TA) stapler (P = .005), by a specialist surgeon (P = .033), and in heavier dogs (P = .027). The odds of intraoperative complications were 19 times higher when surgery was performed without a TA stapler (P = .006). Intraoperative complications were less commonly associated with left (P = .007), but not central (P = .0504) divisional masses than right divisional masses.ConclusionRight divisional masses were prone to intraoperative but not postoperative complications.Clinical significanceClinicians should anticipate an increased risk of intraoperative complications when planning treatment of right divisional masses.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Veterinary

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3